---
url: 'https://ct.giglio-bradylist.com/connecticut/east-haven-police-department'
title: 'East Haven Police Department'
author:
  name: Anonymous
date: '2021-08-28T00:38:55+00:00'
updated: '2026-05-18T22:06:22+00:00'
type: law_enforcement_organization
tags:
  - Connecticut
image: 'https://ct.giglio-bradylist.com/sites/default/files/2026-05/Document%20%284%29.png'
published: true
---
 ##  [East Haven Police Department](/connecticut/east-haven-police-department) 

  

 

 

  


 

 

 

471 North High Street

East Haven, CT 06512

[(203) 468-3820](tel:%28203%29468-3820)



[https://www.easthav…](https://www.easthavenpolice-ct.gov/)

  




 

 



 

##  Notice of Consent Decree 

 The East Haven Police Department is subject to a Consent Decree by the U.S. Department of Justice which directly impacts the organization's systemic credibility. [Learn more &gt;&gt;&gt;](/consent-decrees) 

 



 

 



 

  


 

 

 

 





The East Haven Police Department presents an institutional *Brady/Giglio* concern based on the formal source record of United States Department of Justice \[DOJ\] investigative findings, the DOJ findings letter, the federal complaint, the court-enforceable Agreement for Effective and Constitutional Policing, Joint Compliance Expert reports, compliance filings, closure materials, and related public reform records. That record documents a pattern or practice of discrimination against Latinos, including discriminatory traffic enforcement, harsher post-stop treatment of Latino drivers, non-standard and unacceptable stop justifications, abuse of authority, retaliation against complainants and critics, failure to remedy a history of discrimination, deliberate indifference to minority rights, deficient traffic-stop data collection, failure to implement anti-discrimination policies, deficient internal investigations, limited-English-proficiency failures, consular-rights failures, and serious concerns involving excessive force and unconstitutional searches and seizures. The issue is institutional, not an allegation that every EHPD officer personally committed misconduct. The *Brady/Giglio* concern is that EHPD’s federal civil-rights record creates a heightened witness-system risk affecting the reliability of traffic stops, searches, seizures, arrests, force reports, complaint histories, investigative narratives, supervisory approvals, affidavits, charging support, and courtroom testimony unless the relevant officer, unit, supervisor, command chain, record system, and case file are affirmatively cleared through transparent, verifiable review.

The DOJ findings, findings letter, federal complaint, Agreement for Effective and Constitutional Policing, Joint Compliance Expert reports, compliance materials, and related reform records constitute potential impeachment and exculpatory evidence wherever EHPD personnel supply reports, investigations, arrests, searches, affidavits, charging support, or testimony. The documented failures bear directly on bias, selective enforcement, unlawful seizure, suppression, probable cause, retaliation, motive, credibility, fabrication risk, report accuracy, supervisory reliability, misconduct-detection integrity, training adequacy, discipline, transparency, and agency accountability. Prosecutors relying on EHPD personnel are on notice of heightened *Brady/Giglio* obligations to identify, obtain, preserve, classify, review, and disclose reform-related impeachment material in time for meaningful defense use. Courts must require disclosure safeguards before relying on EHPD-generated testimony or case materials, and POST authorities, bar regulators, and judicial oversight bodies must recognize the certification, ethical, disciplinary, and due-process consequences of undisclosed reform-related impeachment material. The *Brady List* determination is that the East Haven Police Department is not disclosure-ready unless it demonstrates preservation, classification, transmission, and disclosure of all *Brady/Giglio*-relevant material arising from its DOJ findings record, federal complaint, court-enforceable reform agreement, compliance reports, complaint records, stop data, force records, supervisory-review materials, and related institutional failures. Until that showing is made, EHPD remains subject to heightened *Brady/Giglio* concern, and its witnesses, reports, investigations, arrests, searches, affidavits, and testimony require affirmative credibility review before courtroom reliance.



 

 

 Prosecutors have ethical obligations and may be held individually accountable under the Rules of Professional Conduct \[R.P.C.\] for their conduct within the legal system. Violations of these Rules can result in disciplinary actions which may include sanctions, suspension, or disbarment.

- [R.P.C. 3.4: *Fairness to Opposing Party &amp; Counsel*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-34-fairness-opposing-party-counsel "American Bar Association, Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 3.4: Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel")
- [R.P.C. 3.8: *Special Responsibilities of the Prosecutor*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-38-special-responsibilities-prosecutor "American Bar Association, Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of the Prosecutor")
- [R.P.C. 8.3: *Reporting Professional Misconduct*](https://giglio-bradylist.com/model-rule-professional-conduct-rule-83-reporting-professional-misconduct)

 This information has been curated by journalists and [private citizens](/private-citizens "Private Citizens"); and, this platform is available as-a-service to all [Peace Officer Standards &amp; Training \[POST\] Departments](/peace-officer-standards-training-post-departments "Peace Officer Standards & Training [POST] Departments"), [Prosecutors](/prosecutors "Prosecutors"), and [Law Enforcement Organizations \[LEOrgs\]](/organizations-law-enforcement-et-al "Organizations").